Fabrizio Romano reports that Inter will soon decide whether to move forward for Cristian Romero. The financial terms with Tottenham are thought to be workable, but Romero is asking for a salary in line with his current deal. Other clubs are interested and Inter may need departures first. There is no agreement.
Every new evaluation shows the previous and current status, including the rule, reason and time.
Trust Level and Story State updatedInitial evaluation
Trust LevelUnconfirmed
Unconfirmed
XTP-TRUST-1 · The available evidence is not strong enough for a higher rating yet.
Story State Active
Active
XTP-STATE-1 · There is currently no contradiction strong enough to change the story state.
Reasoning
The available evidence is not strong enough for a higher rating yet.
There is currently no contradiction strong enough to change the story state.
Trust Level updatedNew evidence
Trust LevelCredible source
Unconfirmed → Credible source
XTP-TRUST-2 · At least one strong evidence group supports the story.
Story State Active
Active
XTP-STATE-1 · There is currently no contradiction strong enough to change the story state.
Reasoning
At least one strong evidence group supports the story.
There is currently no contradiction strong enough to change the story state.
New evidenceNew evidence
Trust LevelCredible source
Credible source
XTP-TRUST-2 · At least one strong evidence group supports the story.
Story State Active
Active
XTP-STATE-1 · There is currently no contradiction strong enough to change the story state.
Reasoning
At least one strong evidence group supports the story.
There is currently no contradiction strong enough to change the story state.
Story State updatedNew evidence
Trust LevelCredible source
Credible source
XTP-TRUST-2 · At least one strong evidence group supports the story.
Story State Strongly contradicted
Active → Strongly contradicted
XTP-STATE-3 · At least two strong and editorially independent evidence groups contradict the story.
Reasoning
At least one strong evidence group supports the story.
At least two strong and editorially independent evidence groups contradict the story.
Audit trail
Every evaluation remains traceable
Latest evaluation: 07/08/2026, 23:07
Initial evaluationTrust: Unconfirmed · State: ActiveRules: XTP-TRUST-1 (The available evidence is not strong enough for a higher rating yet.) · XTP-STATE-1 (There is currently no contradiction strong enough to change the story state.)
The available evidence is not strong enough for a higher rating yet.
There is currently no contradiction strong enough to change the story state.
New evidenceTrust: Unconfirmed → Credible source · State: ActiveRules: XTP-TRUST-2 (At least one strong evidence group supports the story.) · XTP-STATE-1 (There is currently no contradiction strong enough to change the story state.)
At least one strong evidence group supports the story.
There is currently no contradiction strong enough to change the story state.
New evidenceTrust: Credible source · State: ActiveRules: XTP-TRUST-2 (At least one strong evidence group supports the story.) · XTP-STATE-1 (There is currently no contradiction strong enough to change the story state.)
At least one strong evidence group supports the story.
There is currently no contradiction strong enough to change the story state.
New evidenceTrust: Credible source · State: Active → Strongly contradictedRules: XTP-TRUST-2 (At least one strong evidence group supports the story.) · XTP-STATE-3 (At least two strong and editorially independent evidence groups contradict the story.)
At least one strong evidence group supports the story.
At least two strong and editorially independent evidence groups contradict the story.
